ASPN

Action-Sports Service Provider Network

Month: August, 2010

Skate and Create 3

Doug Works of CBRE, who identified the facility for Transworld’s Skate and Create 3 and negotiated a sweet short term deal on behalf of Transworld’s parent company Bonnier Corp, was very pleased with what the Adidas, Fallen, Etnies and Lakai teams produced in the 30,000 square foot warehouse over a period of just nine days per team. All four videos have been released and can be viewed at: http://skateboarding.transworld.net/skate-and-create/ 

If you are thinking about leasing a warehouse for a short term (minimum three months) for an event or leasing/purchasing a warehouse building for a training facility (TF), contact Doug Works at 760-438-8591.

Real Illusions: How We Trick Ourselves about Finances

We all like to think that we make rational and wise decisions when managing our money. But most of us are influenced far more by our emotions than our brains. Why do smart people make irrational investment decisions so commonly and so easily? The fascinating study of behavioral economics and decision science fills many books, but let’s look at a few of the ways in which investors’ minds play tricks on them.

The Timid Bunny—Worrying Over Risk

Why do so many people bank their money in savings accounts, CDs and money markets when they are often actually losing money if measured against inflation and taxes? Some people do it because they are so fearful of risk that they don’t consider that such fixed investments are not risk-free. The interest credited to your account each month is subject to the likelihood of shrinking purchasing power, especially over time. A canoeist struggling to get upstream against current and wind will have the illusion of movement, but he will have to switch to a boat with a motor to make real progress.

The Hoarding Pack Rat—Treasuring What We Own

The preference to keep things the way they are is called the “status quo bias.”  We tend to fall in love with what we own and stick to the familiar even if we would likely be financially better off with a different investment. We validate our prior choice by sticking with it. What we know feels better than what we don’t know.

The Foolish Sheep—Fearing Loss

We are so averse to accepting loss that we will throw good money after bad. This is sometimes called the “sunk cost fallacy” —our inability to let go of money that’s already been spent or lost. We will invest more money on car repairs simply because we’ve already spent so much on the car.  Rather than evaluate a losing investment on its cost—as we are prone to do—it makes more sense to assess its current potential for loss or gain. If you would not choose to buy that investment today, then why do you make the choice every day to keep your money invested in it? Usually, it is because you are focusing on the past—what you have already spent. But it has no relevance to the future.

The Little Chicken—Focusing on the Negative

We feel the pain that comes from loss more acutely than we do the pleasure from an equal or greater gain. If you invest $100,000 in a stock portfolio, and it rises in value to $150,000 but then drops to $130,000, you are more likely to be motivated by the disappointment in your “loss” of $20,000 than the pleasure in your gain of $30,000. You may focus on your phantom loss rather than your available gain. This can lead you to be less willing to sell a profitable stock and buy an undervalued one, even though we have all heard that it makes more sense to buy low and sell high.

The Stubborn Mule—Refusing to Change

We frequently decide not to decide, and that inaction can cost serious money. There are so many options out there that we become paralyzed and stay with the familiar.

Often this is motivated by fear of short-term regret at making a less-than-perfect decision even though we know that there are no perfect decisions. But, as Mark Twain said, “Twenty years from now, you will be more disappointed by the things you didn’t do than by the things you did do.” By placing more emphasis on what we have already expended than on what could be gained by change, we ignore lost opportunity costs because they don’t seem real. But with your financial security at stake, where you are headed is much more important than where you have been.

Travis D. Fago

Financial Advisor

Morgan Stanley Smith Barney

Office: 858-643-5065

travis.fago@morganstanley.com


Notices & Prohibitions:

The Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Legal and Compliance Department has approved this article for use exactly as it appears. It may not be changed in any way. However, longer articles may be run in two or more parts as long as any disclaimers also appear in the respective parts. Please note that the non-solicitation clause must appear at the end of every article.

This material has been prepared for informational purposes only and is not an offer to buy or sell or a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument, or to participate in any trading strategy.  The securities/instruments discussed in this material may not be suitable for all investors.  Any particular investment should be analyzed based on its terms and risks as they relate to your specific circumstances and objectives.  This is not a research report and was not prepared by the research departments Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated or Citigroup Global Markets Inc.  It was prepared by Morgan Stanley Smith Barney sales, trading or other non-research personnel.  Morgan Stanley Smith Barney makes no representation or warranty with respect to the accuracy or completeness of this material.  Morgan Stanley Smith Barney does not render advice on tax or tax-accounting matters.  This material was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer, for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer under U.S. federal tax laws. Clients should consult with their tax advisors before making any tax-related investment decisions.
Investments and services offered through Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC, member SIPC.

Inventory Costing and Gross Profit Margins…

CPA, “So, where are you getting your goods made?”

Start-up, “We are getting everything made in China.”

CPA, “What are your gross profit percentages like?”

Start-up, “They are great! We are getting like 65% so far!”

CPA, “Wow! That is great! That’s like 15 to 20% higher than I would expect for a start-up.  Is your price point higher than the competition?”

Start-up, “No, we are right on the mark with our tee’s, shorts and denim.”

CPA, “This is your third season so I wouldn’t think that your volume is at a level where you are getting discounts from the factory.  Is that the case?”

Start-up, “No, we are a ways off from the volume discounts.  In fact, we are still required to put up 50% before they start production and the other 50% before they ship.”

CPA, “Speaking of shipping, how do you get your goods shipped over?  Is it all by sea or is there some air freight mixed in there?”

Start-up, “We try to get everything shipped by sea but if things are getting late then we have to go with air so that we don’t miss our delivery dates.  So, I guess it is about 50/50 since our shipments are usually held up because our payment to get the factory to ship is late.”

… and so goes the conversation hitting on various points of items above and beyond the actual unit price of an item that should be included in inventory under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) in the USA as issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”).  To very, very briefly summarize the FASB’s point of view on inventory costing; inventories should include all costs, both direct and indirect, that are incurred to bring inventory to it’s current condition and location.  To actually put this into practice varies from a simple task say for inventory items that are purchased as finished goods from a local vendor (ex. screened tees from a local printer who supplies the blanks) to a complex exercise for inventory items that are manufactured in a company’s own factory overseas.  Most companies in the action sports industry will have a mix of inventory items that require different levels of costing analysis but they generally will not require the more complex calculation and allocation of the various types of direct and indirect costs associated with the manufacturing process (labor, utilities, rent, administrative expenses…) as production is outsourced to various vendors.

In the fabricated conversation above the point being made is that unless inventory costing is understood and properly performed, company management may have an inaccurate view of the company’s actual gross profit margins for its inventory items (think of a hoodie that is screened and imported from China, at a unit cost of $10 and a wholesale price of $20 based on a 50% gross margin).  This inaccurate view may drive inaccurate production decisions, pricing to customers, overall sales decisions, commissions, compensation, misstated financial statements, inaccurate income tax returns… the list can go on and on.  This is because inventory is the core of the business model for an action sports company whether it be apparel, accessories or hard goods and like the saying goes “garbage in, garbage out”.  (Now think of that same hoodie from the example before with a unit price of $10, now add in allocated per unit charges for customs, duties, broker charges, sea/air freight, insurance, and inland freight.  The actual cost is now up to $12 which for the same 50% gross profit would require a wholesale price of $24, but the company already committed to a $20 price to its customer, so now the actual gross profit percent on this item is down from 50% to 40%… and that is before other non-specific cost of goods sold items included in the income statement further drive down the company’s overall gross profit margin…)

So the moral to the story, once the design department is done hammering out every last detail on the cost sheet with regards to the actual production of the inventory, meet up with the accountant (some of us are actually pretty cool people…) and make sure the cost sheet includes line items for everything that is required under GAAP to fully cost the item.  This may sting a little up front and cause a little reworking to get to the margin where you want it if the price point is set but it is better than the alternative of thinking that you are killing it at market and then having your accountant break the news to you after everything is already sold.

Orion Barca, CPA

President

Barca Company, Inc.

949.235.6933

Orion@BarcaCompany.com